Willful Ignorance
Michelle Moody-Adams suggests that the main obstacle to moral progress in social practices is the tendency to widespread affected ignorance of what can and should already be known. This explanation is promising, though to understand it we need to know what willful (affected, motivated, strategic)...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[2017]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2017, Volume: 20, Issue: 1, Pages: 105-119 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NCA Ethics VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy ZD Psychology |
| Further subjects: | B
Affected
B Willful B Motivated B Strategic B Ignorance B Inconvenience |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Michelle Moody-Adams suggests that the main obstacle to moral progress in social practices is the tendency to widespread affected ignorance of what can and should already be known. This explanation is promising, though to understand it we need to know what willful (affected, motivated, strategic) ignorance actually is. This paper presents a novel analysis of this concept, which builds upon Moody-Adams (1994) and is contrasted with a recent account by Lynch (2016). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-016-9722-9 |