A Moral Argument Against Moral Realism

If what is morally right or wrong were ultimately a function of our opinions, then even such reprehensible actions as genocide and slavery would be morally right, had we approved of them. Many moral philosophers find this conclusion objectionably permissive, and to avoid it they posit a moral realit...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Erdur, Melis (Συγγραφέας)
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: Blanchard, Joshua (Βιβλιογραφικός πρόδρομος)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Φόρτωση...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Έκδοση: [2016]
Στο/Στη: Ethical theory and moral practice
Έτος: 2016, Τόμος: 19, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 591-602
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo:NCA Ηθική 
VA Φιλοσοφία
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B Grounding
B Morality
B Objectivity
B Realism
B Anti-realism
B Metaethics
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (Publisher)
Volltext (doi)
Περιγραφή
Σύνοψη:If what is morally right or wrong were ultimately a function of our opinions, then even such reprehensible actions as genocide and slavery would be morally right, had we approved of them. Many moral philosophers find this conclusion objectionably permissive, and to avoid it they posit a moral reality that exists independently of what anyone thinks. The notion of an independent moral reality has been subjected to meticulous metaphysical, epistemological and semantic criticism, but it is hardly ever examined from a moral point of view. In this essay I offer such a critique. I argue that the appeal to an independent moral reality as a ground for moral obligations constitutes a substantive moral mistake. However, I do not conclude from this that we must therefore embrace the opposite view that moral truths are ultimately dependent on our attitudes. Rather, I suggest that we reject both of these views and answer the classic meta-ethical question “Is what we morally ought to do ultimately a function of our actual attitudes, or determined independently of them?” with Neither.
ISSN:1572-8447
Αναφορά:Kritik in "Melis Erdur's Moral Argument Against Moral Realism (2019)"
Περιλαμβάνει:Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10677-015-9676-3