In Defense of the Asymmetric Convergence Model of Public Justification: A Reply to Boettcher
This piece defends the asymmetric convergence model of public justification in response to James Boettchers critique. I maintain both that Boettchers critique of asymmetric convergence fails and that his alternative view, Weak Public Justification, faces a number of serious challenges.
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2016]
|
| En: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Año: 2016, Volumen: 19, Número: 1, Páginas: 255-266 |
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | NCD Ética política VA Filosofía |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
public reason
B Political Liberalism B Convergence B Liberalism B Public justification |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Sumario: | This piece defends the asymmetric convergence model of public justification in response to James Boettchers critique. I maintain both that Boettchers critique of asymmetric convergence fails and that his alternative view, Weak Public Justification, faces a number of serious challenges. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Against the Asymmetric Convergence Model of Public Justification (2015)"
|
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-015-9605-5 |