In Defense of the Asymmetric Convergence Model of Public Justification: A Reply to Boettcher
This piece defends the asymmetric convergence model of public justification in response to James Boettchers critique. I maintain both that Boettchers critique of asymmetric convergence fails and that his alternative view, Weak Public Justification, faces a number of serious challenges.
| Published in: | Ethical theory and moral practice |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2016]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2016, Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Pages: 255-266 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NCD Political ethics VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
public reason
B Political Liberalism B Convergence B Liberalism B Public justification |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This piece defends the asymmetric convergence model of public justification in response to James Boettchers critique. I maintain both that Boettchers critique of asymmetric convergence fails and that his alternative view, Weak Public Justification, faces a number of serious challenges. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Against the Asymmetric Convergence Model of Public Justification (2015)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-015-9605-5 |