Ecosystem Services and the Value of Places
In the US Environmental Protection Agency, the World Wide Fund for Nature and many other environmental organisations, it is standard practice to evaluate particular woods, wetlands and other such places on the basis of the ecosystem services they are thought to provide. I argue that this practice...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Année: 2016, Volume: 19, Numéro: 1, Pages: 101-113 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | NCG Éthique de la création; Éthique environnementale |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Justice
B Duty B Environmental Ethics B Value B Ecosystem services B Place |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Maison d'édition) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | In the US Environmental Protection Agency, the World Wide Fund for Nature and many other environmental organisations, it is standard practice to evaluate particular woods, wetlands and other such places on the basis of the ecosystem services they are thought to provide. I argue that this practice cannot account for one important way in which places are of value to human beings. When they play integral roles in our lives, particular places have a kind of value which cannot be adequately conceived in terms of service provision. Since it is in this respect limited, the ecosystem services framework can, I suggest, be criticised on grounds of justice. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-015-9592-6 |
