Frames, Choice-Reversal, and Consent
Recently Jason Hanna has argued that a particular type of susceptibility to framing effectsnamely, the tendency to reverse ones choice between certain logically equivalent framesinvalidates actual tokens of consent. Here I argue that this claim is false: proneness to choice-reversal per se betwee...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2015]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2015, Volume: 18, Issue: 5, Pages: 1049-1057 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NCA Ethics ZD Psychology |
| Further subjects: | B
Rights
B Consent B Framing effects B Autonomy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Recently Jason Hanna has argued that a particular type of susceptibility to framing effectsnamely, the tendency to reverse ones choice between certain logically equivalent framesinvalidates actual tokens of consent. Here I argue that this claim is false: proneness to choice-reversal per se between the relevant types of frames does not invalidate consent. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-015-9581-9 |
