Civil marriage, same-sex couples, and religious freedom: reflections from a U.S. scholar-activist
In responding to three scholars’ analyses of the public role of religion in the cultural debate about same-sex marriage, a U.S. ethicist and social activist examines a case study of a public debate in the State of Maine (U.S.A.) and considers two questions: (1) how to frame a religious argument in f...
| Опубликовано в: : | Theology & sexuality |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Electronic/Print Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Taylor & Francis
[2017]
|
| В: |
Theology & sexuality
|
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Однополый брак
/ Равноправие
/ Дискриминация
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | CH Христианство и общество NCF Сексуальная этика |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Discrimination
B and conscience claims B the public role of religion B Same-sex marriage B Religious Liberty B Marriage |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | Электронный ресурс
|
| Итог: | In responding to three scholars’ analyses of the public role of religion in the cultural debate about same-sex marriage, a U.S. ethicist and social activist examines a case study of a public debate in the State of Maine (U.S.A.) and considers two questions: (1) how to frame a religious argument in favor of marriage equality rather than one based on a liberal rights framework, and (2) given the religiously based opposition to marriage equality, how to critique their discriminatory claims without deprecating religion itself? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1355-8358 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "“Equal rites before the law” (2017)"
Kritik von "Conscientious objectors and the marrying kind (2017)" Kritik von "Rings for the rainbow family (2017)" |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2017.1351127 |