Civil marriage, same-sex couples, and religious freedom: reflections from a U.S. scholar-activist

In responding to three scholars’ analyses of the public role of religion in the cultural debate about same-sex marriage, a U.S. ethicist and social activist examines a case study of a public debate in the State of Maine (U.S.A.) and considers two questions: (1) how to frame a religious argument in f...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Theology & sexuality
Auteur principal: Ellison, Marvin M. 1948- (Auteur)
Type de support: Numérique/imprimé Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Taylor & Francis [2017]
Dans: Theology & sexuality
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Mariage homosexuel / Égalité des droits / Discrimination
Classifications IxTheo:CH Christianisme et société
NCF Éthique sexuelle
Sujets non-standardisés:B Discrimination
B and conscience claims
B the public role of religion
B Same-sex marriage
B Religious Liberty
B Marriage
Accès en ligne: Volltext (doi)
Édition parallèle:Électronique
Description
Résumé:In responding to three scholars’ analyses of the public role of religion in the cultural debate about same-sex marriage, a U.S. ethicist and social activist examines a case study of a public debate in the State of Maine (U.S.A.) and considers two questions: (1) how to frame a religious argument in favor of marriage equality rather than one based on a liberal rights framework, and (2) given the religiously based opposition to marriage equality, how to critique their discriminatory claims without deprecating religion itself?
ISSN:1355-8358
Référence:Kritik von "“Equal rites before the law” (2017)"
Kritik von "Conscientious objectors and the marrying kind (2017)"
Kritik von "Rings for the rainbow family (2017)"
Contient:Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2017.1351127