Civil marriage, same-sex couples, and religious freedom: reflections from a U.S. scholar-activist
In responding to three scholars’ analyses of the public role of religion in the cultural debate about same-sex marriage, a U.S. ethicist and social activist examines a case study of a public debate in the State of Maine (U.S.A.) and considers two questions: (1) how to frame a religious argument in f...
Veröffentlicht in: | Theology & sexuality |
---|---|
1. VerfasserIn: | |
Medienart: | Elektronisch/Druck Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Taylor & Francis
[2017]
|
In: |
Theology & sexuality
|
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Gleichgeschlechtliche Ehe
/ Gleichberechtigung
/ Diskriminierung
|
IxTheo Notationen: | CH Christentum und Gesellschaft NCF Sexualethik |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Discrimination
B and conscience claims B the public role of religion B Same-sex marriage B Religious Liberty B Marriage |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) |
Parallele Ausgabe: | Elektronisch
|
Zusammenfassung: | In responding to three scholars’ analyses of the public role of religion in the cultural debate about same-sex marriage, a U.S. ethicist and social activist examines a case study of a public debate in the State of Maine (U.S.A.) and considers two questions: (1) how to frame a religious argument in favor of marriage equality rather than one based on a liberal rights framework, and (2) given the religiously based opposition to marriage equality, how to critique their discriminatory claims without deprecating religion itself? |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1355-8358 |
Bezug: | Kritik von "“Equal rites before the law” (2017)"
Kritik von "Conscientious objectors and the marrying kind (2017)" Kritik von "Rings for the rainbow family (2017)" |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2017.1351127 |