Divine election and migration: The worst possible way to address the predicament of refugees?
Some nationalists may suggest that divine election is the best possible way to defend their rights against an influx of people from elsewhere. Others would argue that divine election is the worst possible way to address the plight of refugees. In this contribution the question mark in the title is d...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Stellenbosch University
[2016]
|
| In: |
Stellenbosch theological journal
Year: 2016, Volume: 2, Issue: 1, Pages: 131-148 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CG Christianity and Politics KBN Sub-Saharan Africa NBL Doctrine of Predestination |
| Further subjects: | B
John Calvin
B Migration B Heiko Oberman B Divine Election B Refugees |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | Some nationalists may suggest that divine election is the best possible way to defend their rights against an influx of people from elsewhere. Others would argue that divine election is the worst possible way to address the plight of refugees. In this contribution the question mark in the title is defended by drawing on a) ecumenical discourse on migration, b) Heiko Oberman’s notion of “the reformation of the refugees” and c) by reflecting critically on teaching practices at UWC. It is argued that divine election can indeed offer consolation, especially to refugees, but only if the retrospective and doxological logic is recognised. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2413-9467 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Stellenbosch theological journal
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17570/stj.2016.v2n1.a07 |