A Jewish Response to Gavin D'Costa, "Vatican II: Catholic Doctrines on Jews and Christians"
Responding from a Jewish perspective to Gavin D’Costa’s theology of Jews and Judaism as expressed in his book on Vatican II, I examine the implications of his rejection of some of the most important fruits of Catholic-Jewish dialogue in the past half-century. His theology leaves little space for the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
[2017]
|
In: |
Louvain studies
Year: 2017, Volume: 40, Issue: 3, Pages: 273-285 |
Review of: | Vatican II (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2014) (Langer, Ruth)
|
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Vatican Council 2. (1962-1965 : Vatikanstadt), Nostra aetate
/ Catholic church
/ Judaism
/ Interfaith dialogue
/ Mission (international law
|
IxTheo Classification: | BH Judaism CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDB Roman Catholic Church RJ Mission; missiology |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Responding from a Jewish perspective to Gavin D’Costa’s theology of Jews and Judaism as expressed in his book on Vatican II, I examine the implications of his rejection of some of the most important fruits of Catholic-Jewish dialogue in the past half-century. His theology leaves little space for the living Judaism of today and Jewish self-understanding, matters considered crucial in the Vatican’s implementation documents for Nostra Aetate 4. Consequently, he misunderstands the Jewish perception that all Christian mission, even if non-coercive, constitutes a grave existential threat. Finally, I address D’Costa’s reliance on the concept of ‘invincible ignorance’ and the unfortunate impact of employing technical terminology whose nuances one’s listeners will misunderstand. I suggest alternative framings of all these topics that would be more compatible with Jewish self-understanding. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0024-6964 |
Reference: | Kritik in "A Response to the Essays (2017)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Louvain studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/LS.40.3.3245492 |