Caves of Dispute: Patterns of Correspondence and Suspicion in the Post-2002 “Dead Sea Scrolls” Fragments

Over 30 fragments purportedly from the Dead Sea Scrolls belonging to two private collections were published for the first time in Summer 2016. Virtually all of these fragments in The Schøyen Collection and Museum of the Bible are non-provenanced apart from verbal guarantees made by their sellers. An...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dead Sea discoveries
Main Author: Davis, Kipp (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2017
In: Dead Sea discoveries
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Dead Sea scrolls, Qumran Scrolls / Fragment / Origin / Authenticity / Forgery
IxTheo Classification:HD Early Judaism
HH Archaeology
Further subjects:B Dead Sea Scrolls provenance archaeology Judaean Desert manuscript discoveries textual criticism scribal practices palaeography manuscript forgery
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Over 30 fragments purportedly from the Dead Sea Scrolls belonging to two private collections were published for the first time in Summer 2016. Virtually all of these fragments in The Schøyen Collection and Museum of the Bible are non-provenanced apart from verbal guarantees made by their sellers. An unusual feature of these fragments is that almost all of them correspond to texts from the Hebrew Bible, but also to a few previously known compositions from antiquity. This paper examines the published fragments from both collections according to their observable physical properties, as well as palaeographical and scribal characteristics, and seeks to understand from these more about their potential origin—whether from antiquity or modern times.
ISSN:1568-5179
Contains:Enthalten in: Dead Sea discoveries
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685179-12341441