How not to Argue from Science to Skepticism
For at least several decades, and arguably since the time of Descartes, it has been fashionable to offer scientific or quasi-scientific arguments for skepticism about human knowledge. I critique five attempts to argue for skeptical conclusions from the findings of science and scientifically informed...
| Опубликовано в: : | International journal for the study of skepticism |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
2014
|
| В: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Год: 2014, Том: 4, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 21-35 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Skepticism
knowledge
science
appearance
eliminativism
underdetermination
veil of perception
|
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| Итог: | For at least several decades, and arguably since the time of Descartes, it has been fashionable to offer scientific or quasi-scientific arguments for skepticism about human knowledge. I critique five attempts to argue for skeptical conclusions from the findings of science and scientifically informed common sense. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2210-5700 |
| Второстепенные работы: | In: International journal for the study of skepticism
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22105700-03031081 |