How not to Argue from Science to Skepticism
For at least several decades, and arguably since the time of Descartes, it has been fashionable to offer scientific or quasi-scientific arguments for skepticism about human knowledge. I critique five attempts to argue for skeptical conclusions from the findings of science and scientifically informed...
| Pubblicato in: | International journal for the study of skepticism |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Brill
2014
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Anno: 2014, Volume: 4, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 21-35 |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Skepticism
knowledge
science
appearance
eliminativism
underdetermination
veil of perception
|
| Accesso online: |
Accesso probabilmente gratuito Volltext (Verlag) |
| Riepilogo: | For at least several decades, and arguably since the time of Descartes, it has been fashionable to offer scientific or quasi-scientific arguments for skepticism about human knowledge. I critique five attempts to argue for skeptical conclusions from the findings of science and scientifically informed common sense. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2210-5700 |
| Comprende: | In: International journal for the study of skepticism
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22105700-03031081 |