How not to Argue from Science to Skepticism
For at least several decades, and arguably since the time of Descartes, it has been fashionable to offer scientific or quasi-scientific arguments for skepticism about human knowledge. I critique five attempts to argue for skeptical conclusions from the findings of science and scientifically informed...
| Publicado en: | International journal for the study of skepticism |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Brill
2014
|
| En: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Año: 2014, Volumen: 4, Número: 1, Páginas: 21-35 |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Skepticism
knowledge
science
appearance
eliminativism
underdetermination
veil of perception
|
| Acceso en línea: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| Sumario: | For at least several decades, and arguably since the time of Descartes, it has been fashionable to offer scientific or quasi-scientific arguments for skepticism about human knowledge. I critique five attempts to argue for skeptical conclusions from the findings of science and scientifically informed common sense. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2210-5700 |
| Obras secundarias: | In: International journal for the study of skepticism
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22105700-03031081 |