Theological Speculation in Irenaeus: Perils and Possibilities
For over seventy years scholars have accepted the reading advanced by T.-A. Audet, R.M. Grant, and W.R. Schoedel that Irenaeus of Lyons was strictly opposed to causal speculation. This article challenges their reading and offers one of its own. I contend that Irenaeus argues for a differentiated kno...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2017
|
| In: |
Vigiliae Christianae
Year: 2017, Volume: 71, Issue: 2, Pages: 175-198 |
| IxTheo Classification: | FA Theology KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Irenaeus of Lyons
theological speculation
Empiricism
Scepticism
economic theology
Trinitarian theology
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | For over seventy years scholars have accepted the reading advanced by T.-A. Audet, R.M. Grant, and W.R. Schoedel that Irenaeus of Lyons was strictly opposed to causal speculation. This article challenges their reading and offers one of its own. I contend that Irenaeus argues for a differentiated knowledge of terrestrial and celestial matters, such that some things are known while others are not. This differentiation of knowledge encompasses questions of causation. Irenaeus, I argue, was not just concerned about the perils of theological speculation but also its possibilities. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0720 |
| Contains: | In: Vigiliae Christianae
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700720-12341293 |