ON AESTHETICALLY QUALIFIED CHARACTERS AND THEIR MUTUAL INTERLACEMENTS
Discussions about the aesthetic relation frame (or modal aspect) are often focused on subject-object relations, on objects of arts, their production and their perception.1 A Christian philosophical anthropology emphasizes human subject-subject relations and human acts, including more than the produc...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2003
|
| In: |
Philosophia reformata
Year: 2003, Volume: 68, Issue: 2, Pages: 137-147 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | Discussions about the aesthetic relation frame (or modal aspect) are often focused on subject-object relations, on objects of arts, their production and their perception.1 A Christian philosophical anthropology emphasizes human subject-subject relations and human acts, including more than the production of artefacts. According to the philosophy of the cosmonomic idea, any kind of human act has an aesthetic aspect. Yet, I shall restrict myself to types of characters (or structures of individuality) that are aesthetically qualified. I shall discuss (1) characters of acts, which objects are not typically aesthetic; (2) characters of acts, which objects are aesthetically qualified; (3) characters of acts performed in subject-subject relations, and (4) characters of aesthetically qualified associations. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2352-8230 |
| Contains: | In: Philosophia reformata
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22116117-90000288 |