Human Persons as Substantial Achievers
A debate is raging in our culture between two ways of understanding what it is to be a person. We are torn between understanding personhood in metaphysical terms, as a kind of entity, and understanding personhood as anachievement, a status which is attributed to something by virtue of that thing’s a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
1993
|
In: |
Philosophia reformata
Year: 1993, Volume: 58, Issue: 2, Pages: 100-112 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | A debate is raging in our culture between two ways of understanding what it is to be a person. We are torn between understanding personhood in metaphysical terms, as a kind of entity, and understanding personhood as anachievement, a status which is attributed to something by virtue of that thing’s activities and/or relationships. On the first view persons are what we are; on the second view persons are something which we must become. I shall term these two ways of thinking about human personhood the metaphysical theory and the achievement theory. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2352-8230 |
Contains: | In: Philosophia reformata
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22116117-90000059 |