Searching for Non-Toxic Religion
This article provides more accurate tools to engage the public nature of religious and other ideological claims by proposing a distinction between belief-policies, beliefs and practices that could enable more acute ways of locating the aspects of ideology that are considered problematic in a given s...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article | 
| Language: | English | 
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway | 
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) | 
| Published: | 
          
        2011
     | 
| In: | 
      International journal of public theology          
     Year: 2011, Volume: 5, Issue: 4, Pages: 476-487  | 
| Further subjects: | B
        Religion And Public Life
        tolerance
        Daniel Dennett
        dogmatism
     | 
| Online Access: | 
                  Volltext (Publisher)                 | 
| Summary: | This article provides more accurate tools to engage the public nature of religious and other ideological claims by proposing a distinction between belief-policies, beliefs and practices that could enable more acute ways of locating the aspects of ideology that are considered problematic in a given situation. In addition, the article proposes rules of engagement for how we might deal with these aspects in public discourse. | 
|---|---|
| Physical Description: | Online-Ressource | 
| ISSN: | 1569-7320 | 
| Contains: | In: International journal of public theology
     | 
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI:  10.1163/156973211X595952 |