WHERE THE CONFLICT REALLY LIES: PLANTINGA, THE CHALLENGE OF EVIL, AND RELIGIOUS NATURALISM
In this paper I argue that, although Alvin Plantinga’s Felix Culpa theodicy appears on only two pages (i.e. 58-59) of his recent book Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion and Naturalism (2011), it is of pivotal importance for the book as a whole. Plantinga argues that there is superfici...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2014
|
| In: |
Philosophia reformata
Year: 2014, Volume: 79, Issue: 1, Pages: 66-82 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | In this paper I argue that, although Alvin Plantinga’s Felix Culpa theodicy appears on only two pages (i.e. 58-59) of his recent book Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion and Naturalism (2011), it is of pivotal importance for the book as a whole. Plantinga argues that there is superficial conflict but deep concord between science and monotheism, and that there is superficial concord but deep conflict between science and naturalism. I contend that the weakness of the Felix Culpa theodicy lends support to the view that there is more than superficial conflict between science and monotheism, and offer an alternative response to the challenge of evil which suggests that there might be, after all, concord between science and (religious) naturalism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2352-8230 |
| Contains: | In: Philosophia reformata
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22116117-90000563 |