Alice and Laurence Oliphant’s Divine Androgyne and “The Woman Question”
This article offers a historical and cultural analysis of two treatises of heterodox spirituality: Sympneumata (1885) and Scientific Religion (1888), and a novel, Massolam (1886). The main author was the celebrated Victorian diplomat Laurence Oliphant (1829-1888). Drawing on the teachings of the Ame...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
[2016]
|
| In: |
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 84, Issue: 2, Pages: 498-529 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Oliphant, Laurence 1829-1888
/ Oliphant, Alice Le Strange -1886
/ Harris, Thomas Lake 1823-1906
/ Androgyny (Psychology)
/ Spiritualism (Theology)
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This article offers a historical and cultural analysis of two treatises of heterodox spirituality: Sympneumata (1885) and Scientific Religion (1888), and a novel, Massolam (1886). The main author was the celebrated Victorian diplomat Laurence Oliphant (1829-1888). Drawing on the teachings of the American “prophet” Thomas Lake Harris (1823-1906), Laurence Oliphant and his wife, Alice Le Strange (1846-1886), taught that everyone has a spiritual and physical complement of the opposite gender that can be encountered internally through spiritual practice. Humanity must abandon sexual intercourse in favor of individual communion with this counterpart, in order to return to its prelapsarian androgynous nature. Despite antecedents in earlier esoteric currents, the Oliphants' androgyne was a Victorian androgyne. It was intimately entwined with the pressing social, cultural, intellectual, political, and religious needs of a secularizing world in which the roles and rights of Woman were central—and contested—issues. It can be read as an answer to the nineteenth-century “problem of sex” and the “Woman Question,” and it was both conservative and transgressive. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4585 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: American Academy of Religion, Journal of the American Academy of Religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfv061 |