Conflict in Current Roman Catholic Systematic Theology: A Diagnosis and Response
Recent conversations concerning conflict in theology have brought into play the role of such figures as Augustine, Aquinas, and Bonaventure. On the one hand, they can be seen to represent polarizing theological attitudes; on the other hand, they can be seen to represent forgotten models that may hel...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publ.
[2015]
|
| In: |
Theological studies
Year: 2015, Volume: 76, Issue: 3, Pages: 423-447 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Thomas Aquinas 1225-1274
/ Johannes Bonaventura, Kardinal, Heiliger 1221-1274
/ Lonergan, Bernard J. F. 1904-1984
/ Ricœur, Paul 1913-2005
/ Hermeneutics
|
| IxTheo Classification: | KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Recent conversations concerning conflict in theology have brought into play the role of such figures as Augustine, Aquinas, and Bonaventure. On the one hand, they can be seen to represent polarizing theological attitudes; on the other hand, they can be seen to represent forgotten models that may help repair fragmentary modes of current reason. This article (1) invites a reexamination of philosophical resources, principally through Paul Ricoeur and Bernard Lonergan, that address critical issues of method, and (2) proposes a strategy of communication among diverse modes of reasoning. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-1304 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040563915593468 |