Ethics, Human Oocytes and the Teleology of the Body: An Appreciation of Gilbert Meilaender’s Work
Gilbert Meilaender has been an important contributor to the field of bioethics for decades. His insistence that there is a natural teleology of the body that should constrain ambitions of the will in bioethics deserves careful attention. This article examines the idea of a natural teleology of the b...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
[2017]
|
In: |
Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 133-143 |
IxTheo Classification: | KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDB Roman Catholic Church NBE Anthropology NCH Medical ethics |
Further subjects: | B
mitochondrial replacement techniques
B oocyte B ROBERTSON, John B Gilbert Meilaender B Bioethics B reproductive technology B Meilaender, Gilbert B Teleology |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Gilbert Meilaender has been an important contributor to the field of bioethics for decades. His insistence that there is a natural teleology of the body that should constrain ambitions of the will in bioethics deserves careful attention. This article examines the idea of a natural teleology of the body as it applies to human oocytes. It argues that approaching human eggs in terms of their telos rather than their moral status is useful. The article examines how Meilaender deploys the idea of a natural teleology to reject John Robertson’s work on assisted reproduction, particularly his preoccupation with procreative liberty. Finally, the article raises questions about the sharp contrast Meilaender draws between teleology and intentionality. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0953-9468 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Friendly Rejoinders (2017)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0953946816684075 |