Tales of Two Cities (in the Second-Century BCE): Jerusalem and Nineveh

This article reviews the two roughly contemporary deutero-canonical works from the second century BCE: the book of Judith and the book of Tobit. Both of these books agree in making Nineveh/Assyria the antagonist, even though the Medes had destroyed that city more than four hundred years before. This...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dick, Michael Brennan 1943- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado: [2016]
En: Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha
Año: 2016, Volumen: 26, Número: 1, Páginas: 32-48
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Bibel. Judit / Bibel. Tobit / Jerusalén / Ninive / Historia 200 a. C.-100 a. C. / Profecía / Tempel Jerusalem (Jerusalem, Motiv)
Clasificaciones IxTheo:BH Judaísmo
HB Antiguo Testamento
HD Judaísmo primitivo
Otras palabras clave:B Peripeteia
B Tobit
B Judith
B Nineveh
B BIBLE. Apocrypha. Judith
B Nineveh (Extinct city)
B Jerusalén
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descripción
Sumario:This article reviews the two roughly contemporary deutero-canonical works from the second century BCE: the book of Judith and the book of Tobit. Both of these books agree in making Nineveh/Assyria the antagonist, even though the Medes had destroyed that city more than four hundred years before. This article proposes that Nineveh, ‘the evil city’, functions as an antipodal to the Holy City of Jerusalem. Despite the seemingly irresistible imperial power of Assyria embodied in its seventh-century capital, God's plans prophesied through the anti-Assyrian oracles of Isaiah and other prophets will not prove false. This peripeteia culminates in an eschatological New Jerusalem with its thoroughly renewed Temple for its God.
ISSN:1745-5286
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0951820716670776