Leibniz on unbaptized infant damnation

Leibniz consistently denies that unbaptized infants are condemned to hell in virtue of original sin. He is less than forthcoming, however, about where they go when they die. Scholars are divided on this issue. Some think that, according to Leibniz, they go to limbo, while others think that he is com...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bobier, Christopher (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2016]
Em: International journal for philosophy of religion
Ano: 2016, Volume: 80, Número: 2, Páginas: 185-194
Outras palavras-chave:B Augustinianism
B Leibniz
B Divine Justice
B Virtue
B Original Sin
B Infant baptism
B Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Freiherr von, 1646-1716
B Damnation
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:Leibniz consistently denies that unbaptized infants are condemned to hell in virtue of original sin. He is less than forthcoming, however, about where they go when they die. Scholars are divided on this issue. Some think that, according to Leibniz, they go to limbo, while others think that he is committed to the view that they go to heaven. The aim of this paper is to show that this scholarly attention is misguided and that Leibniz does not defend a position regarding the fate of unbaptized infants.
ISSN:1572-8684
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-015-9546-x