Atheism and epistemic justification
In a recent article in this journal, Andrew Johnson seeks to defend the 'New Atheism' against several objections. We provide a philosophical assessment of his defense of contemporary atheistic arguments that are said to amount to bifurcation fallacies. This point of discussion leads to our...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2015
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 78, Issue: 1, Pages: 91-106 |
| Further subjects: | B
Atheism
B Epistemic Justification B Presumption of agnosticism B LEHRER, Keith B Theism B Keith Lehrer B Antony Flew B Bifurcation fallacy B Presumption of atheism B FLEW, Antony, 1923-2010 B Agnosticism B Negative existence claims B New Atheism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1559177535 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230125165821.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170531s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-014-9484-z |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1559177535 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)489177530 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ489177530 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)131539256 |0 (DE-627)510508480 |0 (DE-576)167530259 |4 aut |a Corlett, J. Angelo |d 1958- | |
| 109 | |a Corlett, J. Angelo 1958- |a Corlett, J. A. 1958- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Atheism and epistemic justification |c J. Corlett |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In a recent article in this journal, Andrew Johnson seeks to defend the 'New Atheism' against several objections. We provide a philosophical assessment of his defense of contemporary atheistic arguments that are said to amount to bifurcation fallacies. This point of discussion leads to our critical discussion of the presumption of atheism and the epistemic justification of atheism. | ||
| 601 | |a Atheismus | ||
| 601 | |a Episteme | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Agnosticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Antony Flew | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Atheism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bifurcation fallacy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemic Justification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a FLEW, Antony, 1923-2010 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Keith Lehrer | |
| 650 | 4 | |a LEHRER, Keith | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Negative existence claims | |
| 650 | 4 | |a New Atheism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Presumption of agnosticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Presumption of atheism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cangelosi, Josh |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 78(2015), 1, Seite 91-106 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:78 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:91-106 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9484-z |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2970530708 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1559177535 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170531124527 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170531||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||