Atheism and epistemic justification
In a recent article in this journal, Andrew Johnson seeks to defend the 'New Atheism' against several objections. We provide a philosophical assessment of his defense of contemporary atheistic arguments that are said to amount to bifurcation fallacies. This point of discussion leads to our...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | |
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
2015
|
| Στο/Στη: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Έτος: 2015, Τόμος: 78, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 91-106 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Atheism
B Epistemic Justification B Presumption of agnosticism B LEHRER, Keith B Theism B Keith Lehrer B Antony Flew B Bifurcation fallacy B Presumption of atheism B FLEW, Antony, 1923-2010 B Agnosticism B Negative existence claims B New Atheism |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | In a recent article in this journal, Andrew Johnson seeks to defend the 'New Atheism' against several objections. We provide a philosophical assessment of his defense of contemporary atheistic arguments that are said to amount to bifurcation fallacies. This point of discussion leads to our critical discussion of the presumption of atheism and the epistemic justification of atheism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8684 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11153-014-9484-z |
