“We Have the Prophets”: Inspiration and the Prophets in Athenagoras of Athens
In contrast to those who argue simply that Athenagoras’s discussion of the prophets and inspiration is Hellenic, sourced in Philo as well as in Plato and Plutarch, this paper claims that there are other sources to consider that are equally informative. Athenagoras manifests alliance and dependence u...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2016
|
In: |
Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum
Year: 2016, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, Pages: 211-242 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Athenagoras, Atheniensis ca. 2. Jh.
/ Greece (Antiquity)
/ Philosophy
/ Jewish Christianity
/ Prophet
|
IxTheo Classification: | HD Early Judaism KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NBB Doctrine of Revelation |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | In contrast to those who argue simply that Athenagoras’s discussion of the prophets and inspiration is Hellenic, sourced in Philo as well as in Plato and Plutarch, this paper claims that there are other sources to consider that are equally informative. Athenagoras manifests alliance and dependence upon the Septuagint, other Jewish sources, the New Testament and second-century Christian sources, especially Ignatius and Justin. Athenagoras is a Christian philosopher. We would expect to see such a broad-based platform of resources for his theological construction. A simple classification of Greek, Hellenistic or Philonic for his notion of the inspired prophets is incomplete, unreflective of his own ingenuity, and fails to adequately account for his Judaeo-Christian heritage. It also minimizes the elegance of this early Christian attempt to theologize about the Jewish prophets in a gentile world. In Athenagoras we have an explanation of the prophets and inspiration that (1) clearly positions them preeminently as rational, doctrinal Christian authorities above the poets, philosophers, and human opinions; (2) constructs his community’s theology with an artistic flair that selectively and critically weaves together both pagan and Judaeo-Christian sources; so that (3) he might win a hearing from both his imperial and ecclesiastical audience. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1612-961X |
Contains: | In: Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/zac-2016-0031 |