Bulgakov's Account of Creation: Neglected Aspects, Critics and Contemporary Relevance

The article focuses on a central, yet neglected dimension of the ‘Sophia Debate’ in twentieth-century Russian Orthodox theology: Bulgakov's panentheistic account of creation and its critique by Nikolai Lossky. Bulgakov understood the doctrine of creation to be negatively defined as creatio ex n...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of systematic theology
Main Author: Gavriljuk, Pavel L. 1972- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2015]
In: International journal of systematic theology
IxTheo Classification:KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KDF Orthodox Church
NBC Doctrine of God
NBD Doctrine of Creation
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:The article focuses on a central, yet neglected dimension of the ‘Sophia Debate’ in twentieth-century Russian Orthodox theology: Bulgakov's panentheistic account of creation and its critique by Nikolai Lossky. Bulgakov understood the doctrine of creation to be negatively defined as creatio ex nihilo and positively defined as creatio ex Deo. Bulgakov's sophiology seeks to relate God and the world through the intermediate concept of Sophia, balancing an account of God's being in the world with an account of the world's eternal foundation in God. Lossky objected that Bulgakov's account underemphasizes novelty, contingency and the free character of creation. Lossky's objections notwithstanding, Bulgakov's version of panentheism - especially its trinitarian, antinomian and kenotic dimensions - finds significant points of contact with contemporary accounts of creation.
ISSN:1468-2400
Contains:Enthalten in: International journal of systematic theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/ijst.12119