Closing the Gaps—Some Notes on the Making of Perspectives
This special issue revolves around two main problems that need disentangling: the emic–etic debate and the insider–outsider problem. As the appointed discussant to the workshop in which this issue’s papers were first presented, I noted the emergence of some related and recurring problems on which I...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
2016
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Έτος: 2016, Τόμος: 28, Τεύχος: 4/5, Σελίδες: 465-477 |
| Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Θρησκειολογία
/ Μέθοδος
/ Κανονιστικότητα
/ Σχετικότητα
/ Λόγος
|
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | ΑΑ Θρησκειολογία |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Methodology
normativity
e- and i-religion
type–token relations
relativism
discourse\s on religion
|
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Publisher) |
| Σύνοψη: | This special issue revolves around two main problems that need disentangling: the emic–etic debate and the insider–outsider problem. As the appointed discussant to the workshop in which this issue’s papers were first presented, I noted the emergence of some related and recurring problems on which I further elaborate in this article. These problems can be summed up as differences in methods and theories in various disciplines that create “gaps” between their results. Moreover, there are problems concerning matters of scale, type–token relations, questions about the relations between the public and private character of religion, the seemingly inevitable ambiguities of relativism and, finally, the various modes of discourse on religion\s. |
|---|---|
| Φυσική περιγραφή: | Online-Ressource |
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | In: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341365 |
