Is There a Room for Queer Desires in the House of Biblical Scholarship? : A Methodological Reflection on Queer Desires in the Context of Contemporary New Testament Studies
When tackling the issue of homosex, New Testament interpreters either read the biblical text as continuously relevant to our present (continuism) or as completely estranged from contemporary conceptions of desire (alteritism). This article explores the historiographical styles underlying both hermen...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2015
|
| In: |
Biblical interpretation
Year: 2015, Volume: 23, Issue: 3, Pages: 399-427 |
| IxTheo Classification: | FD Contextual theology HC New Testament NCF Sexual ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
queer theory
Romans
historiography
contextual hermeneutics
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | When tackling the issue of homosex, New Testament interpreters either read the biblical text as continuously relevant to our present (continuism) or as completely estranged from contemporary conceptions of desire (alteritism). This article explores the historiographical styles underlying both hermeneutical strategies to argue that, despite their many advantages, continuism and alteritism both have homophobic and/or queerphobic foundations and occlude from contemporary debates of sexuality’s multiple queer desires and practices (like “straights” having queer sex). By surveying recent developments in queer historiography, I conclude that no comprehensive account of desire is equipped to account for the present, and, thus, virtual dis/identifications with the biblical past cannot be guaranteed or foreclosed.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5152 |
| Contains: | In: Biblical interpretation
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685152-00230P05 |