Kryptic or cryptic? The Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation as a concrete-nature Christology
Andrew Ter Ern Loke has proffered a creative, novel, and bold model of the Incarnation as a contribution to analytic theological discussions of Christology. Recent work in this field has offered a distinction between abstract-nature and concrete-nature conceptions of natures. The former holds that e...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2016
|
| In: |
Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Year: 2016, Volume: 58, Issue: 2, Pages: 229-243 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Loke, Andrew Ter Ern
/ Incarnation of Jesus Christ
/ Hypostatic union
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism KDG Free church NBF Christology |
| Further subjects: | B
Incarnation
Christology
Apollinarianism
Nestorianism
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1546234756 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604125342.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160817r20162016xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/nzsth-2016-0014 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1546234756 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)476234751 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ476234751 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-B1597)nzsth-2016-0014 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Arcadi, James M. |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Kryptic or cryptic? The Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation as a concrete-nature Christology |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Andrew Ter Ern Loke has proffered a creative, novel, and bold model of the Incarnation as a contribution to analytic theological discussions of Christology. Recent work in this field has offered a distinction between abstract-nature and concrete-nature conceptions of natures. The former holds that entities have properties which entail their membership in a particular kind, the latter holds that being a member of a certain kind entails the having of certain properties. Loke’s model, what he calls the Divine Preconscious Model, holds that at the Incarnation the divine attributes of the Word were submerged into the Word’s preconscious, while the conscious of the Word took on certain human properties. This model, Loke holds, entails Christ’s full divinity and full humanity without falling into Apollinarianism or Nestorianism. However, I argue that because Loke avers that his model runs on a concrete-nature account of natures, he is not able to maintain the full humanity of Christ. I suggest two ways Loke might be able to maintain the integrity of his model, either by embracing a form of neo-Apollinarianism or by adopting the abstract-nature perspective of natures. | ||
| 520 | |a Andrew Ter Ern Loke hat ein kreatives, mutiges und neuartiges Modell der Menschwerdung als Beitrag zu analytisch-theologischen Betrachtungen der Christologie vorgebracht. Gegenwärtige Arbeiten in diesem Bereich haben in Bezug auf den Begriff Natur einen Unterschied zwischen abstrakter Natur und konkreter Natur geliefert. Erstere vertritt die These, dass Wesen Eigenschaften haben, welche Zugehörigkeit zu einer bestimmten Art mit sich bringen; Letztere beinhaltet, dass Zugehörigkeit einer bestimmten Art bestimmte Eigenschaften mit sich bringt. Lokes „divine preconscious model“ vertritt die Meinung, dass bei der Menschwerdung die göttlichen Attribute des Logos in das Vorbewusstsein desselben untertauchten, während sich das Bewusstsein des Logos bestimmte menschliche Eigenschaften aneignete. Laut Loke bringt dieses Modell volle Göttlichkeit sowie volle Menschlichkeit Christi mit sich, ohne sich weder dem Apollinarianismus noch dem Nestorianismus preiszugeben. Der Autor dieses Beitrags vertritt die Meinung, dass Loke die volle Menschheit Christi nicht aufrechterhalten kann, weil Loke behauptet, dass sein Model die These einer konkreten Natur voraussetzt. Der Autor schlägt zwei Möglichkeiten vor, wie die Integrität von Lokes Modell erhalten werden kann: Entweder durch die Annahme einer Art Neo-Apollinarianismus oder durch die Betrachtungsweise einer abstrakten Natur. | ||
| 534 | |c 2016 | ||
| 601 | |a Christologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Incarnation |x Christology |x Apollinarianism |x Nestorianism | |
| 652 | |a AB:KDG:NBF | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)1030390177 |0 (DE-627)73519629X |0 (DE-576)378207113 |2 gnd |a Loke, Andrew Ter Ern |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)1023789752 |0 (DE-627)718474155 |0 (DE-576)36744481X |2 gnd |a Inkarnation Jesu |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4161139-1 |0 (DE-627)105472263 |0 (DE-576)209863412 |2 gnd |a Hypostatische Union |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 1963 |g 58(2016), 2, Seite 229-243 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)330068520 |w (DE-600)2049677-1 |w (DE-576)094533318 |x 1612-9520 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:58 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:229-243 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Ter Ern Loke, Andrew |t On the Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation and concrete-nature Christology: A reply to James Arcadi |d 2017 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)1557879559 |w (DE-576)487879554 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nzsth-2016-0014 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2937002196 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1546234756 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180611094558 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160817||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a gruy | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442050470 |a KDG | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051787 |a NBF | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Hypostatic union,Incarnation of Jesus Christ,Incarnation of Jesus,Incarnation of Christ,Jesus Christ,Incarnation |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Incarnation de Jésus,Union hypostatique |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Encarnación de Jesús,Unión hipostática |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Incarnazione di Gesù,Unione ipostatica |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 位格合一,两性联合 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 位格合一,兩性聯合 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Encarnação de Jesus,União hipostática |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Воплощение христово,Ипостасное соединение |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ενσάρκωση του Ιησού,Υποστατική ένωση |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Ter Ern Loke, Andrew,Ern Loke, Andrew ter,Loke, Andrew , Inkarnation Christi,Menschwerdung Jesu,Menschwerdung Christi , Unio hypostatica,Zweinaturenlehre |