A theological alternative to Grube’s notion of "Justified religious difference"
Grube proposes a framework for respectful dealing with different religions: "Justified religious difference." The author comments on the epistemic setting of Grube’s thesis. It testifies a cognitive approach to religious faith by handling religious faith and epistemic belief as analogous a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[2016]
|
In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 76, Issue: 5, Pages: 453-457 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religious pluralism
/ Faith
/ Cognition theory
|
IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AG Religious life; material religion AX Inter-religious relations VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Grube proposes a framework for respectful dealing with different religions: "Justified religious difference." The author comments on the epistemic setting of Grube’s thesis. It testifies a cognitive approach to religious faith by handling religious faith and epistemic belief as analogous argument. His criticism of the pluralist approach is not very convincing. This framework is too abstract for an interreligious dialogue. The author proposes a concept of religious faith within a web of practices, liturgical rituals. A concrete interreligious dialogue can enrich the Christian faith in its practical styling. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-2327 |
Reference: | Kritik von "Justified religious difference (2016)"
Kritik in "Reply to the respondents to "Justified religious difference: a constructive approach to religious diversity" (2016)" |
Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2016.1142672 |