Response to Bucar and Stalnaker
This comment provides a brief response to criticisms of Kelsay (2012) set forth in a recent essay by Elizabeth Bucar and Aaron Stalnaker.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2014]
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2014, Volume: 42, Issue: 3, Pages: 564-570 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Ethics
/ Comparative religion
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion NCA Ethics |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | This comment provides a brief response to criticisms of Kelsay (2012) set forth in a recent essay by Elizabeth Bucar and Aaron Stalnaker. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0384-9694 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Response to papers for "ethnography, anthropology, and comparative religious ethics" focus (2010)"
Kritik von "The present state of the comparative study of religious ethics (2012)" Kritik von "On comparative religious ethics as a field of study (2014)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12070 |