Consensus and Difference: The Elusive Nature of Ecumenical Agreement
The article examines the elusive nature of ecumenical agreement and the slippery notion of consensus, particularly in dialogue between the Roman Catholic, the Lutheran and the Anglican Churches, not least in the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (1999) between the Roman Catholic Chu...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2012
|
| Dans: |
Ecclesiology
Année: 2012, Volume: 8, Numéro: 1, Pages: 54-70 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Ecumenical Dialogue
ecumenical consensus
ecumenical agreement
Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | The article examines the elusive nature of ecumenical agreement and the slippery notion of consensus, particularly in dialogue between the Roman Catholic, the Lutheran and the Anglican Churches, not least in the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (1999) between the Roman Catholic Church and the Lutheran World Federation. In a critical engagement with Minna Hietamäki's Agreeable Agreement: An Examination of the Quest for Consensus in Ecumenical Dialogue (2010), the article draws attention to the general lack of critical reflection on methodology in ecumenical dialogue and encourages a heightened awareness of its pitfalls. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5316 |
| Contient: | In: Ecclesiology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/174553112X619726 |