Cassian in Syria?: The Evidence of Innocent I

In the late fourth and early fifth centuries we are informed of the activities of Cassian by Palladius in his defence of John Chrysostom and by Innocent i, both with regard to the exile of John Chrysostom in 404 and with regard to the reconciliation between the churches of Rome and Antioch in 414. D...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vigiliae Christianae
Main Author: Dunn, Geoffrey D. 1962- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2015
In: Vigiliae Christianae
Year: 2015, Volume: 69, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-17
IxTheo Classification:KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
KBL Near East and North Africa
RB Church office; congregation
Further subjects:B John Cassian John Chrysostom Innocent i Palladius Melitian schism
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Summary:In the late fourth and early fifth centuries we are informed of the activities of Cassian by Palladius in his defence of John Chrysostom and by Innocent i, both with regard to the exile of John Chrysostom in 404 and with regard to the reconciliation between the churches of Rome and Antioch in 414. Do these three instances refer to the same person and is that person John Cassian? In this paper it is argued that Palladius does indeed refer to John Cassian and so does Innocent i in his comments about the exile of John Chrysostom. However, the individual involved in the reconciliation between Antioch and Rome is to be seen as a different person, contrary to the opinion of several scholars. This becomes evident through a close reading of Innocent i’s Epistulae 19 and 20.
ISSN:1570-0720
Contains:In: Vigiliae Christianae
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700720-12341224