Christianisme et philosophie chez Origène. By Joseph S. O’Leary

This is a thought-provoking book. It is O’Leary’s contention that Platonism and the Bible (and, indeed, philosophy and theology generally) are distinct and cannot be synthesized. It is only when the tensions between the two are recognized and perceived in the works of the Fathers that those works ca...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Widdicombe, Peter (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2012
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2012, Volume: 63, Issue: 2, Pages: 716-718
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This is a thought-provoking book. It is O’Leary’s contention that Platonism and the Bible (and, indeed, philosophy and theology generally) are distinct and cannot be synthesized. It is only when the tensions between the two are recognized and perceived in the works of the Fathers that those works can be read aright. In this, he pits himself against those such as Lewis Ayres, who, in Nicea and its Legacy, maintains that Platonism was an aid to the development of Christian thought in the patristic period, and those such as Mark Edwards, who minimizes both the dichotomy between Judaism and Hellenism in Palestine at the time of Christ and the influence of Platonism on Origen’s thought.
ISSN:1477-4607
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jts/fls095