The Hijab Ban Verdict: A Case Note on Aishat Shifat v. The State of Karnataka

Should judges engage in theological deliberations? This question has often been asked in the context of religious claims before the courts in India. Following the hijab ban by the Karnataka government, the subsequent decision of the Karnataka High Court (khc) upholding it, and a split verdict by the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Sinha, Navin (Author) ; Dutta, Mitul (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2023
In: Journal of law, religion and state
Year: 2023, Volume: 11, Issue: 1/3, Pages: 35-58
Further subjects:B right to religion
B Proportionality
B hijab decision
B Aishat Shifat
B Secularism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1876265019
003 DE-627
005 20231217055504.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231217s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22124810-11010002  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1876265019 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1876265019 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Sinha, Navin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Hijab Ban Verdict: A Case Note on Aishat Shifat v. The State of Karnataka 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Should judges engage in theological deliberations? This question has often been asked in the context of religious claims before the courts in India. Following the hijab ban by the Karnataka government, the subsequent decision of the Karnataka High Court (khc) upholding it, and a split verdict by the Supreme Court of India (sci), the question is doing the rounds once again. The present article attempts to critically analyze the decisions of the khc and the sci on the hijab controversy. The analysis draws on the claim of Justice Dhulia that the courts are not the proper forum to engage in theological deliberations, and judicial interference is warranted only when the limits set by the Constitution are violated. In alignment with the claims of Justice Dhulia, the present article argues that in matters concerning government interference in religious practices, the focus of the reviewing court should be more on the legitimacy of the restriction rather than the religious validity of the practice. The author agrees with Justice Dhulia that in matters concerning the right to religion, proportionality is objectively the better standard of judicial review, as it dissuades the court from inquiring into the religious and cultural practices of the parties. 
601 |a Karnataka 
650 4 |a Aishat Shifat 
650 4 |a Proportionality 
650 4 |a Secularism 
650 4 |a hijab decision 
650 4 |a right to religion 
700 1 |a Dutta, Mitul  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of law, religion and state  |d Leiden : Brill, 2012  |g 11(2023), 1/3, Seite 35-58  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)796586713  |w (DE-600)2783973-4  |w (DE-576)414227638  |x 2212-4810  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:2023  |g number:1/3  |g pages:35-58 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22124810-11010002  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jlrs/11/1-3/article-p35_002.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 11  |j 2023  |e 1/3  |h 35-58 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4439316808 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1876265019 
LOK |0 005 20231217055504 
LOK |0 008 231217||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-12-16#F65FBB739600A60A908CEAE7825CD7AC11BB0BE8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL