The Bahir and Its Historiography: A Reassessment

The book Bahir is a linchpin in the current historiography of Kabbalah, yet its origins are murky. The dominant theory, espoused by Gershom Scholem and his successors, treats the Bahir as a stratified work whose earliest elements originated in antiquity in the East. The book supposedly underwent a l...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bar-Asher, Avishai (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Chicago Press 2023
In: The journal of religion
Year: 2023, Volume: 103, Issue: 2, Pages: 115-144
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1865984809
003 DE-627
005 20231017171135.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231017s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1086/723757  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1865984809 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1865984809 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1047869209  |0 (DE-627)779360621  |0 (DE-576)40169142X  |4 aut  |a Bar-Asher, Avishai 
109 |a Bar-Asher, Avishai 
245 1 4 |a The Bahir and Its Historiography: A Reassessment 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The book Bahir is a linchpin in the current historiography of Kabbalah, yet its origins are murky. The dominant theory, espoused by Gershom Scholem and his successors, treats the Bahir as a stratified work whose earliest elements originated in antiquity in the East. The book supposedly underwent a long, tortuous process of textual consolidation, during which its components came into contact with various esoteric circles, such as the German Pietists and "first kabbalists" of southern France. This account is to a large extent the foundation of an all-encompassing history of Kabbalah’s emergence, which has not gone unchallenged but still profoundly shapes scholarly discourse. This study thoroughly reassesses all of the evidence for this grand narrative, and concludes that it is a blend of biased interpretation and imaginative invention, which proceeds from a purist, dichotomizing approach to textual, philological, socio-intellectual, and conceptual history. Furthermore, the narrative’s conceptual constructs have constricted scholarly thinking about core kabbalistic ideas, the nature of theosophical kabbalists, and more. Therefore, despite the satisfyingly granular detail of this narrative, we remain very much in the dark about the true origins of the Bahir and, by extension, of early Kabbalah. In the epilogue, I suggest fully reinvestigating the Bahir’s textual tradition, especially in light of recent discoveries, and partly reviving forgotten but promising historical and philological avenues of inquiry in order to write a new history of the so-called first kabbalistic book. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of religion  |d Chicago, Ill. : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1921  |g 103(2023), 2, Seite 115-144  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)329085689  |w (DE-600)2047675-9  |w (DE-576)113710593  |x 1549-6538  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:103  |g year:2023  |g number:2  |g pages:115-144 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1086/723757  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 103  |j 2023  |e 2  |h 115-144 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391373521 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1865984809 
LOK |0 005 20231017165632 
LOK |0 008 231017||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL