The Aim of a Theory of Justice

Amartya Sen argues that for the advancement of justice identification of ‘perfect’ justice is neither necessary nor sufficient. He replaces ‘perfect’ justice with comparative justice. Comparative justice limits itself to comparing social states with respect to degrees of justice. Sen’s central thesi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Boot, Martijn (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2012
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2012, Volume: 15, Issue: 1, Pages: 7-21
Further subjects:B John Rawls
B Amartya Sen
B Impossibility theorem
B Ideal theory
B Incomplete ordering
B Theory of justice
B Comparative justice
B Social choice theory
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785696475
003 DE-627
005 20220112044105.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-011-9308-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785696475 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785696475 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Boot, Martijn  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Aim of a Theory of Justice 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Amartya Sen argues that for the advancement of justice identification of ‘perfect’ justice is neither necessary nor sufficient. He replaces ‘perfect’ justice with comparative justice. Comparative justice limits itself to comparing social states with respect to degrees of justice. Sen’s central thesis is that identifying ‘perfect’ justice and comparing imperfect social states are ‘analytically disjoined’. This essay refutes Sen’s thesis by demonstrating that to be able to make adequate comparisons we need to identify and integrate criteria of comparison. This is precisely the aim of a theory of justice (such as John Rawls’s theory): identifying, integrating and ordering relevant principles of justice. The same integrated criteria that determine ‘perfect’ justice are needed to be able to adequately compare imperfect social states. Sen’s alternative approach, which is based on social choice theory, is incapable of avoiding contrary, indeterminate or incoherent directives where plural principles of justice conflict. 
650 4 |a Amartya Sen 
650 4 |a John Rawls 
650 4 |a Ideal theory 
650 4 |a Impossibility theorem 
650 4 |a Incomplete ordering 
650 4 |a Comparative justice 
650 4 |a Social choice theory 
650 4 |a Theory of justice 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 15(2012), 1, Seite 7-21  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2012  |g number:1  |g pages:7-21 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474503  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9308-5  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 15  |j 2012  |e 1  |h 7-21 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033755373 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785696475 
LOK |0 005 20220112044105 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#8180A6237E783A516935CBF3699E22F444C82396 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474503 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw