Corporate Psychological Defences: An Oil Spill Case

Organisational psychological defences protect the self-esteem and moral integrity of the organisational personality even at the expense of sacrificing the morality of actions. This paper analyses the spectrum of defences used by an oil refinery and its parent company during an oil spill incident. A...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ketola, T. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2006
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2006, Volume: 65, Issue: 2, Pages: 149-161
Further subjects:B organisational excuses
B oil spill
B Crisis Management
B organisational refusals
B defence behaviour
B organisational concessions
B organisational psychological defences
B organisational justifications
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785625500
003 DE-627
005 20220112043625.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-005-4175-4  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785625500 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785625500 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ketola, T.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Corporate Psychological Defences: An Oil Spill Case 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Organisational psychological defences protect the self-esteem and moral integrity of the organisational personality even at the expense of sacrificing the morality of actions. This paper analyses the spectrum of defences used by an oil refinery and its parent company during an oil spill incident. A hypothetical model of defences built on Swajkowski’s four responses to accusations of organisational misconduct – refusals, excuses, justifications and concessions – is tested through this case. On the basis of empirical findings it is obvious that defences delay, impede and interrupt the mitigation and recovery actions of incidents. It is not possible to break the defence behaviour of individuals because it is a built-in psychological mechanism in all humans serving a valuable purpose of dosing the pain of injury. However, it is possible to separate individual and organisational behaviour so that automatic organisational procedures mitigate, recover and, ultimately, prevent incidents. The organisational psychological task of crisis management is to mitigate the organisation’s ego defences, recover from its emotional turmoil and prevent further traumas by making its ego stronger and more flexible. The argument of this paper is that in practice organisational defences act as bumpers against becoming too conscious of the gap between the corporate rhetoric and reality, as subconscious breaks against too fast change demands, and as batteries in their preconscious effort to prepare for the change. Organisational refusals act as bumpers, excuses as breaks and justifications as batteries, while concessions imply that a change towards a more responsible corporation is taking place. 
601 |a Psychologie 
650 4 |a organisational refusals 
650 4 |a organisational justifications 
650 4 |a organisational excuses 
650 4 |a organisational psychological defences 
650 4 |a organisational concessions 
650 4 |a oil spill 
650 4 |a defence behaviour 
650 4 |a Crisis Management 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 65(2006), 2, Seite 149-161  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:65  |g year:2006  |g number:2  |g pages:149-161 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123778  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-4175-4  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 65  |j 2006  |e 2  |h 149-161 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033684379 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785625500 
LOK |0 005 20220112043625 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#EED2BDDA4E1F9B6F4DB129AD93F4B60452BD07A0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123778 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw