Privacy at Work – Ethical Criteria
New technologies and practices, such as drug testing, genetic testing, and electronic surveillance infringe upon the privacy of workers on workplaces. We argue that employees have a prima facie right to privacy, but this right can be overridden by competing moral principles that follow, explicitly o...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2003
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2003, Volume: 42, Issue: 1, Pages: 59-70 |
| Further subjects: | B
Privacy
B Ethics B Surveillance B genetic testing B Drug Testing B Work B contract of employment B ethical criteria |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785618784 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230427062126.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1023/A:1021600419449 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785618784 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785618784 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Persson, Anders J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Privacy at Work – Ethical Criteria |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2003 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a New technologies and practices, such as drug testing, genetic testing, and electronic surveillance infringe upon the privacy of workers on workplaces. We argue that employees have a prima facie right to privacy, but this right can be overridden by competing moral principles that follow, explicitly or implicitly, from the contract of employment. We propose a set of criteria for when intrusions into an employee's privacy are justified. Three types of justification are specified, namely those that refer to the employer's interests, to the interests of the employee her- or himself, and to the interests of third parties such as customers and fellow workers. For each of these three types, sub-criteria are proposed that can be used to determine whether a particular infringement into an employee's privacy is morally justified or not. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Work | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surveillance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Privacy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a genetic testing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ethical criteria | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Drug Testing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a contract of employment | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hansson, Sven Ove |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 42(2003), 1, Seite 59-70 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2003 |g number:1 |g pages:59-70 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074944 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021600419449 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 42 |j 2003 |e 1 |h 59-70 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033677658 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785618784 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043553 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#6C5AFD0BAE66934AB1919CC062B58801FA428542 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074944 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||