The Mitochondrial Replacement ‘Therapy’ Myth

This article argues that two forms of mitochondrial replacement therapy, maternal spindle transfer (MST) and pro-nuclear transfer (PNT), are not therapies at all because they do not treat children who are coming into existence. Rather, these technologies merely create healthy children where none was...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rulli, Tina (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2017]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 31, Issue: 5, Pages: 368-374
IxTheo Classification:NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B Ethics
B Genetics
B reproductive technology
B Identity
B mitochondrial replacement
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727655613
003 DE-627
005 20230426130611.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200824s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12332  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727655613 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727655613 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rulli, Tina  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Mitochondrial Replacement ‘Therapy’ Myth 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article argues that two forms of mitochondrial replacement therapy, maternal spindle transfer (MST) and pro-nuclear transfer (PNT), are not therapies at all because they do not treat children who are coming into existence. Rather, these technologies merely create healthy children where none was inevitable. Even if creating healthy lives has some value, it is not to be confused with the medical value of a cure or therapy. The article addresses a recent Bioethics article, ‘Mitochondrial Replacement: Ethics and Identity,’ by Wrigley, Wilkinson, and Appleby, who argue that PNT is morally favorable to MST due to the Non-Identity Problem. Wrigley et al. claim that PNT, since it occurs post-conception, preserves the identity of the resulting child, whereas MST, since it occurs pre-conception, is an identity-altering technique. As such, a child born with mitochondrial disease could complain that her parents failed to use PNT, but not MST. The present article argues that the authors are mistaken: both MST and PNT are identity-affecting techniques. But this is of little matter, for we should be cautious in drawing any moral conclusions from the application of the Non-Identity Problem to cases. The article then argues that the authors are mistaken in inferring that PNT is a type of embryonic cure or therapy for children with mitochondrial disease. The article cautions against the mistaken life-saving rhetoric that is common in bioethics discussions of MRTs. 
601 |a Therapie 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Genetics 
650 4 |a Identity 
650 4 |a mitochondrial replacement 
650 4 |a reproductive technology 
652 |a NCH 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 31(2017), 5, Seite 368-374  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2017  |g number:5  |g pages:368-374 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12332  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12332  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 31  |j 2017  |e 5  |h 368-374 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3742292382 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727655613 
LOK |0 005 20210902110703 
LOK |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw