A moral reason to be a mere theist: improving the practical argument

This paper is an attempt to improve the practical argument for beliefs in God. Some theists, most famously Kant and William James, called our attention to a particular set of beliefs, the Jamesian-type beliefs, which are justified by virtue of their practical significance, and these theists tried to...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liu, Xiaofei (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2016
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 79, Issue: 2, Pages: 113-132
Further subjects:B God Faithfulness
B MORAL & ethical aspects
B REASONING (Logic)
B The practical argument
B William James
B SELF-defeating behavior
B Moral Motivation
B THEISTS
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1559348798
003 DE-627
005 20230125165414.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170601s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-015-9517-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1559348798 
035 |a (DE-576)489348793 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ489348793 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-627)1251358659  |0 (DE-576)181358654  |4 aut  |a Liu, Xiaofei 
109 |a Liu, Xiaofei  |a Liu Xiao fei  |a Xiaofei Liu  |a Liu Xiaofei 
245 1 2 |a A moral reason to be a mere theist  |b improving the practical argument  |c Xiaofei Liu 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper is an attempt to improve the practical argument for beliefs in God. Some theists, most famously Kant and William James, called our attention to a particular set of beliefs, the Jamesian-type beliefs, which are justified by virtue of their practical significance, and these theists tried to justify theistic beliefs on the exact same ground. I argue, contra the Jamesian tradition, that theistic beliefs are different from the Jamesian-type beliefs and thus cannot be justified on the same ground. I also argue that the practical argument, as it stands, faces a problem of self-defeat. I then construct a new practical argument that avoids both problems. According to this new argument, theistic beliefs are rational to accept because such beliefs best supply us with motivation strong enough to carry out demanding moral tasks. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a God  |x Faithfulness 
650 4 |a MORAL & ethical aspects 
650 4 |a Moral Motivation 
650 4 |a REASONING (Logic) 
650 4 |a SELF-defeating behavior 
650 4 |a THEISTS 
650 4 |a The practical argument 
650 4 |a William James 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 79(2016), 2, Seite 113-132  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:79  |g year:2016  |g number:2  |g pages:113-132 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/LIUAMR.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-015-9517-2  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig 
936 u w |d 79  |j 2016  |e 2  |h 113-132 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2970845865 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1559348798 
LOK |0 005 20170601151558 
LOK |0 008 170601||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL