Religion as Social Reality
In this article I argue that the shift from a private to a public–social understanding of religion raises new ontological and epistemological questions for the scientific study of religion\s. These questions are deeply related to three central features of the emic–etic debate, namely the problems of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2016
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 28, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 421-444 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Searle, John R. 1932-, The construction of social reality
/ Science of Religion
/ Emic analysis
/ Etic analysis
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion AD Sociology of religion; religious policy |
| Further subjects: | B
John Searle
social ontology
epistemology
collective intentionality
comparison
subjectivity
objectivity
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Rights Information: | InC 1.0 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1554627478 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231019115723.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170302s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15700682-12341369 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1554627478 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)484627473 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ484627473 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)106743917X |0 (DE-627)818729201 |0 (DE-576)426645588 |4 aut |a Rota, Andrea |d 1983- | |
| 109 | |a Rota, Andrea 1983- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religion as Social Reality |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this article I argue that the shift from a private to a public–social understanding of religion raises new ontological and epistemological questions for the scientific study of religion\s. These questions are deeply related to three central features of the emic–etic debate, namely the problems of intentionality, objectivity, and comparison. Focusing on these interrelated issues, I discuss the potential of John Searle’s philosophy of society for the scientific study of religion\s. Considering the role of intentionality at the social level, I present Searle’s concept of “social ontology” and discuss its epistemological implications. To clarify Searle’s position regarding the objectivity of the social sciences, I propose a heuristic model contrasting different stances within the scientific study of religion\s. Finally, I explore some problematic aspects of Searle’s views for a comparative study of religion\s, and sketch a solution within his framework. I shall argue that a distinction between the epistemological and ontological dimensions of religious affairs would help clarify the issues at stake in the past and future of the emic–etic debate. | ||
| 540 | |q DE-Tue135 |a Urheberrechtsschutz 1.0 |2 rs |u http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a John Searle |x social ontology |x epistemology |x collective intentionality |x comparison |x subjectivity |x objectivity | |
| 652 | |a AA:AD | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)7524609-0 |0 (DE-627)510429076 |0 (DE-576)253453011 |a Searle, John R. |2 gnd |d 1932- |t The construction of social reality |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049426-3 |0 (DE-627)106187058 |0 (DE-576)209082003 |2 gnd |a Religionswissenschaft |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4834950-1 |0 (DE-627)493131663 |0 (DE-576)217032095 |2 gnd |a Emische Analyse |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4834949-5 |0 (DE-627)493131655 |0 (DE-576)217032087 |2 gnd |a Etische Analyse |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Method & theory in the study of religion |d Leiden : Brill, 1989 |g 28(2016), 4/5, Seite 421-444 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)34189656X |w (DE-600)2069397-7 |w (DE-576)100668399 |x 1570-0682 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2016 |g number:4/5 |g pages:421-444 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341369 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 28 |j 2016 |e 4/5 |h 421-444 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2957070855 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1554627478 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230224142635 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170302||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x #031 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x Manuskript | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril |a rwzw | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042966 |a AA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043016 |a AD | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Emic analysis,Etic analysis,Science of Religion,Religious studies,Religionswissenschaft,Religions |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Analyse émique,Analyse étique,Science des religions |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Análisis émica,Análisis ética,Ciencias de la religión |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Analisi emica,Analisi etica,Scienze religiose |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教学 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教學 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Análise ética,Análise êmica,Ciências da religião |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Религиоведение,Эмический анализ,Этический анализ |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ημική ανάλυση,Ητική ανάλυση,Θρησκειολογία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Searle, John R.,1932-,Die Konstruktion der gesellschaftlichen Wirklichkeit , Religious studies,Religionsphilosophie,Scholasticism,Scholastik,Theologie,Theology,Religionsforschung |