Deus ut tentus vel visus: die Debatte um die Seligkeit im reflexiven Akt (ca. 1293-1320)

In his Sentences Commentary (published circa 1320), the Carmelite John Baconthorp discusses the question of whether beatitude is a reflexive act. He refers to John of Paris's view in which beatitude is an act of knowing that we possess God and Durandus of St. Pourc¿ʹain's view that it is k...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Contributors: Jeschke, Thomas (Other)
Format: Electronic Book
Language:German
Latin
Subito Delivery Service: Order now.
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Leiden Boston Brill 2011
In:Year: 2011
Series/Journal:Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters Bd. 104
Further subjects:B Holiness Catholic Church History of doctrines Middle Ages, 600-1500
B John
B John 1240?-1306
B Baconthorpe, John (-1346) Sentences commentary
B Durandus of Saint-Pourçain, Bishop of Meaux (approximately 1275-1334)
B Durandus
B béatitude ; vision (théologie) ; Moyen-Âge
B God (Christianity) Knowableness History of doctrines Middle Ages, 600-1500
B Holiness Catholic Church History of doctrines Middle Ages, 600-1500
B God (Christianity) Knowableness History of doctrines Middle Ages, 600-1500
B Durandus approximately 1275-1334
B Electronic books
B John of Paris (1240?-1306)
B RELIGION ; Christian Life ; General
B Baconthorpe, John -1346
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Print version: Deus ut tentus vel visus:
Description
Summary:In his Sentences Commentary (published circa 1320), the Carmelite John Baconthorp discusses the question of whether beatitude is a reflexive act. He refers to John of Paris's view in which beatitude is an act of knowing that we possess God and Durandus of St. Pourc¿ʹain's view that it is knowing that we know God. The object of the first is God as possessed (Deus ut tentus) and the second is God as known ( Deus ut visus ). Taking Baconthorp's account as a starting point, the present study adopts a threefold approach: First it analyzes Baconthorp's text on its own terms. Next it reconstructs the 13th/14th-century debate on the basis of the original sources. Finally it compares Baconthorp's narration with the historical positions, drawing further conclusions about Baconthorp's specific methodology
Preliminary Material -- Einführung -- Kapitel I. Die Debatte um die Seligkeit im reflexiven Akt bei Johannes Baconthorp -- Kapitel II. Die These des Johannes von Paris als Ausgangspunkt der Debatte um die Seligkeit im reflexiven Akt -- Kapitel III. Die Kritik an der These des Johannes von Paris -- Kapitel IV. Die These des Durandus von St. Pourçain als zweiter Teil der Debatte -- Kapitel V. Die Kritik an den Thesen des Durandus -- Kapitel VI. Die Erzählung des Johannes Baconthorp und die historische Debatte -- Einleitung zu den Editionstexten -- Appendix A. Johannes Baconthorp, In primum Sententiarum, d. 1, q. 1, a. 1-2 -- Appendix B. Johannes Quidort von Paris, In quartum Sententiarum, d. 49 -- Appendix C. Petrus von Auvergne, Quodlibet primum, q. 7 -- Appendix D. Herveus Natalis, Quaestiones disputatae de beatitudine, q. 4 -- Appendix E. Johannes von Pouilly, Quodlibet quintum, q. 7 -- Appendix F. Durandus von St. Pourçain, In quartum Sententiarum (A/B), d. 49, q. 5 -- Appendix G. Petrus de Palude, In primum Sententiarum, d. 1, q. 1 und q. 3 -- Appendix H. Petrus de Palude, In quartum Sententiarum, d. 49, q. 4 -- Appendix I. Johannes von Neapel, Quodlibet sextum, q. 15 -- Appendix K. Petrus Aureoli, In quartum Sententiarum, d. 49, q. 3-5 -- Verzeichnis der Quellen und der Literatur -- Namenregister -- Sachregister.
Item Description:Originally presented as the author's thesis--Universität zu Köln and Universita del Salento, Lecce, 2009. - Includes bibliographical references and indexes. - In German. - Description based on print version record
Originally presented as the author's thesis--Universität zu Köln and Universita del Salento, Lecce, 2009
ISBN:9004191887