The Corinthian dissenters and the Stoics

This book focuses on the controversy recorded in 1 Corinthians 15 regarding the denial of the resurrection of the dead. Many attempts and proposals have been made to understand the background of Paul's opponents. By focusing on the possible impact of Stoicism, Albert V. Garcilazo argues that th...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Опубликовано в: :Studies in biblical literature
Главный автор: Garcilazo, Albert V. (Автор)
Формат: Print
Язык:Английский
Слжба доставки Subito: Заказать сейчас.
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: New York, NY Bern Frankfurt am Main Berlin Vienna [u.a.] Lang 2007
В: Studies in biblical literature (106)
Обзоры:, in: RBLit 10 (2008)* 10 (2008)* (Joubert, Stephan)
Серии журналов/журналы:Studies in biblical literature 106
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности):B Bibel. Korintherbrief 1. / Воскресение (мотив) / Стоицизм
B Paulus, Apostel, Heiliger / Bibel. Paulinische Briefe / Богословие (мотив)
B Bibel. Neues Testament / Антропология
B Греция (древность, мотив) (Древность) / Философия (мотив)
B Bibel. Neues Testament / Окружающая среда (мотив)
Индексация IxTheo:HC Новый Завет
Другие ключевые слова:B Bible. Corinthians, 1st Criticism, interpretation, etc
B Воскресение Христово
B Стоицизм
B Bibel. Korintherbrief 1.
B Resurrection Biblical teaching
B Академические публикации
B Космология (мотив)
B Resurrection History of doctrines Early church, ca. 30-600
B Stoics Influence
B Neutestamentliche Ethik
B Bibel. Korintherbrief 1. 15
B Воскресение (мотив)
Online-ссылка: Cover (Verlag)
Содержание
Table of contents only
Описание
Итог:This book focuses on the controversy recorded in 1 Corinthians 15 regarding the denial of the resurrection of the dead. Many attempts and proposals have been made to understand the background of Paul's opponents. By focusing on the possible impact of Stoicism, Albert V. Garcilazo argues that the internal evidence of the letter indicates that some of the Corinthians had adopted a realized eschatology as well as an antisomatic view of the resurrection, which in turn prompted them to reject the future resurrection of the dead. Garcilazo suggests that the higher status members of the congregation were influenced by the cosmological, anthropological, and ethical teachings of the Stoa, especially the teachings of the Stoic philosophers, particularly the teachings of Seneca. Following a brief overview of Stoicism, the author concentrates on some of the theological issues revealed in the letter and examines how other scholars have interpreted 1 Corinthians 15. Finally, he provides a detailed analysis of 1 Corinthians 15:12-49. In short, Garcilazo argues that the philosophy of the Stoics seemingly contributed to the resurrection controversy recorded in 1 Corinthians 15.
Примечание:Includes bibliographical references (p. [229]-239) and indexes
ISBN:0820495212