Von der Vielfalt der ägyptischen Sprache in der griechisch-römischen Zeit

In this article the discussion is continued, in answer to a position of Dieter Kurth, if it is justified to speak of a specific ‘Ptolemaic’ phase of Egyptian language. Current models of the development of written and spoken Egyptian are discussed and shown to be insufficient in view of the complexit...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quack, Joachim Friedrich (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2013
In: Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde
Year: 2013, Volume: 140, Issue: 1, Pages: 35-52
Further subjects:B text transmission
B El-Tod
B Ptolemaic
B language change
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1966886667
003 DE-627
005 20260321055535.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260321s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c
024 7 |a 10.1524/zaes.2013.0004  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1966886667 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1966886667 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ger 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Quack, Joachim Friedrich  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Von der Vielfalt der ägyptischen Sprache in der griechisch-römischen Zeit 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this article the discussion is continued, in answer to a position of Dieter Kurth, if it is justified to speak of a specific ‘Ptolemaic’ phase of Egyptian language. Current models of the development of written and spoken Egyptian are discussed and shown to be insufficient in view of the complexity of the actual attestations. In particular, it is not possible to postulate a simple binary opposition with a situation of ‘diglossia’. Rather, the full spectrum of different stages of the Egyptian language can turn up in texts attested in the later periods. A number of cases is brought forth in order to demonstrate that the Egyptian did not consider ‘classical’ Egyptian to be obligatory for religious compositions. Given that Egyptian temple inscriptions of the Graeco-Roman period are linguistically not homogenous, it is not possible to define ‘Ptolemaic’ as a specific phase of the language. 
601 |a Vielfalt 
650 4 |a text transmission 
650 4 |a Ptolemaic 
650 4 |a language change 
650 4 |a El-Tod 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde  |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 1863  |g 140(2013), 1, Seite 35-52  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)579823369  |w (DE-600)2452498-0  |w (DE-576)286500248  |x 2196-713X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:140  |g year:2013  |g number:1  |g pages:35-52 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1637049242  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1524/zaes.2013.0004  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1524/zaes.2013.0004/html  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4940384969 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1966886667 
LOK |0 005 20260321055535 
LOK |0 008 260321||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-10-22#B18CB2B02EB53502B826E352ED8D2C4A8212E44B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 2026-03-21  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB