Two Coptic Homographs and the Missing Link in the Etymology of et-Tôd: ⲧⲟⲩⲱⲧ I and ⲧⲟⲩⲱⲧ II Preserving twt(w) “Image” and t(w)t(we) “Chapel”

The commonly accepted etymology of the Arabic toponym et-Tôd as being directly descended from Ḏrtj is diagnosed as incomplete and complemented by a missing intermediate stage: ( p' ) T(w)t(we) = ⲡⲧⲟⲩⲱⲧ, a pseudetymology “the Chapel/Temple” is first attested in a Demotic inscription of the Ptole...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Krueger, Frederic (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado: 2019
En: Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde
Año: 2019, Volumen: 146, Número: 2, Páginas: 161-163
Otras palabras clave:B Pseudetymology
B Toponymy
B et-Tôd
B Temple of Montu
B Monasteries of Armant
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1966879563
003 DE-627
005 20260321055525.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260321s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1515/zaes-2019-0016  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1966879563 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1966879563 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Krueger, Frederic  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Krueger, Frederic 
245 1 0 |a Two Coptic Homographs and the Missing Link in the Etymology of et-Tôd: ⲧⲟⲩⲱⲧ I and ⲧⲟⲩⲱⲧ II Preserving twt(w) “Image” and t(w)t(we) “Chapel” 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The commonly accepted etymology of the Arabic toponym et-Tôd as being directly descended from Ḏrtj is diagnosed as incomplete and complemented by a missing intermediate stage: ( p' ) T(w)t(we) = ⲡⲧⲟⲩⲱⲧ, a pseudetymology “the Chapel/Temple” is first attested in a Demotic inscription of the Ptolemaic period and again in two Coptic ostraca of the 6 th century CE, probably referring to the temple of et-Tôd and born of a desire to make new sense of the better attested variant ⲧⲟⲟⲩⲧ in which the original etymology was no longer recognizable. Ongoing coexistence of both forms might also explain Arabic variations. The etymology of et-Tôd furthermore shows that two distinct Demotic words for “image” and for “chapel/temple” survive but are obscured by their identical spelling in Coptic as ⲧⲟⲩⲱⲧ, which dictionaries have identified only with the former. 
601 |a Etymologie 
650 4 |a Toponymy 
650 4 |a Temple of Montu 
650 4 |a et-Tôd 
650 4 |a Pseudetymology 
650 4 |a Monasteries of Armant 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde  |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 1863  |g 146(2019), 2, Seite 161-163  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)579823369  |w (DE-600)2452498-0  |w (DE-576)286500248  |x 2196-713X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:146  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:161-163 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/zaes-2019-0016  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zaes-2019-0016/html  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4940377024 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1966879563 
LOK |0 005 20260321055525 
LOK |0 008 260321||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-10-22#A835D0A0AEF9689277A2AF9BD7D25A85BFB9D298 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrk  |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 2026-03-21  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB