Why Pediatric Ethics Needs a Theory of Goodness

We begin this commentary with a brief analysis of “Making Medical Decisions for Children with Profound Cognitive Disabilities: Pluralism and the Best Interest Standard,” by Pierce Randall, and “A Life Worth Sustaining? Bestowed Worth and Pediatric Care,” by Daniel T. Kim and Xiang Yu, in the same is...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori: Tate, Tyler (Autore) ; Schiff, Jenny Clark (Autore) ; Grekov, Karolina (Autore) ; Burford, Akilah (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2026
In: The Hastings Center report
Anno: 2026, Volume: 56, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 43-45
Altre parole chiave:B Decision-making
B Disability
B Pediatrics
B Goodness
B best interest
B clinical ethics
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1965621228
003 DE-627
005 20260318055504.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 260318s2026 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/hast.70053  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1965621228 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1965621228 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Tate, Tyler  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Tate, Tyler 
245 1 0 |a Why Pediatric Ethics Needs a Theory of Goodness 
264 1 |c 2026 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a We begin this commentary with a brief analysis of “Making Medical Decisions for Children with Profound Cognitive Disabilities: Pluralism and the Best Interest Standard,” by Pierce Randall, and “A Life Worth Sustaining? Bestowed Worth and Pediatric Care,” by Daniel T. Kim and Xiang Yu, in the same issue of the Hastings Center Report. These two articles examine decision-making for children with profound cognitive disabilities and critique the relational potential standard found in pediatric ethics. We agree with the authors that the relational potential standard risks using children as a means to other people's ends. We also raise two additional concerns: the standard is incongruent with parents’ self-descriptions, and it neglects the concept of goodness, which we take to be the fundamental concern of pediatric ethical analysis. We close with a brief discussion of goodness and consider how goodness might serve as the lodestar of pediatric ethics. 
650 4 |a clinical ethics 
650 4 |a best interest 
650 4 |a Decision-making 
650 4 |a Disability 
650 4 |a Pediatrics 
650 4 |a Goodness 
700 1 |a Schiff, Jenny Clark  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Grekov, Karolina  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Burford, Akilah  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hastings Center  |t The Hastings Center report  |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971  |g 56(2026), 2, Seite 43-45  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346551  |w (DE-600)2067369-3  |w (DE-576)258761822  |x 1552-146X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:56  |g year:2026  |g number:2  |g pages:43-45 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.70053  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.70053  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4937740849 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1965621228 
LOK |0 005 20260318055504 
LOK |0 008 260318||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2026-03-17#3EC8A518D26619660E617D57B3A0C169C2C122FE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
LOK |0 939   |a 2026-03-18  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw